Difference between revisions of "Chem321:Week 2"
m (New due date) |
(Add one) |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[Chem321:Unit 6|Unit 6]] | | [[Chem321:Unit 6|Unit 6]] | ||
| − | | Hill Ch. 5,<br/>[http://www.epa.gov/wastes/conserve/smm/pdf/vision2.pdf RCRA vision statement (exec summary only)] | + | | Hill Ch. 5,<br/>[http://www.epa.gov/wastes/conserve/smm/pdf/vision2.pdf RCRA vision statement (exec summary only)] |
| − | + | | [http://video.nationalgeographic.com/video/greenhouse-gases Nat. Geographic <br/>on greenhouse gases] | |
| | | | ||
| [[Chem321:Problem Set 3|Problem Set 3]] by July 20th. | | [[Chem321:Problem Set 3|Problem Set 3]] by July 20th. | ||
Latest revision as of 02:27, 16 July 2015
| Units | Reading | Videos | Discussions | Assignments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unit 3 | Hill chapter 1 article by Matthew & Boltz |
None | Discussion 4, on wiki M-W then M-F. | Problem Set 2 by |
| Unit 4 | Dorf, pages 101-107 & Dorf Chap 19; Responsible Innovation (read p17-21); Article by Bakker et al. |
None | Discussion 6, (Wed/Fri) | Problem Set 2 by |
| Unit 5 | Hill chapter 4 | None | Problem Set 3 by July 20th. | |
| Unit 6 | Hill Ch. 5, RCRA vision statement (exec summary only) |
Nat. Geographic on greenhouse gases |
Problem Set 3 by July 20th. |
There will also be this discussion on the Acme scenario.
