Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chem395:April 25 discussion"
(→Discussion: start) |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
:Hello! [[User:J-Fed|J-Fed]] 16:01, 25 April 2008 (EDT) | :Hello! [[User:J-Fed|J-Fed]] 16:01, 25 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
:: Yes sir. [[User:Murphy44|Murphy44]] 16:02, 25 April 2008 (EDT) | :: Yes sir. [[User:Murphy44|Murphy44]] 16:02, 25 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | OK. You're an enlightened 21st Century executive in a company. How do you go about changing the corporate culture? What's the best strategy to make the environment a real priority, instead of just something you tack on for PR for marketing? [[User:Walkerma|Walkerma]] 16:05, 25 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
==Footers== | ==Footers== | ||
Revision as of 16:05, 25 April 2008
How could one change the corporate culture within a company from a traditional view (environmental regulations are just a burden) to a progressive view, where environmental factors are considered right from the start in product & process design, as well as in the accounting. Today's discussion will consider how best to convince both managers and workers. See the article page for background information.
Contents
Preparation
Agenda
- What strategy should we use for changing the corporate culture at a company like Acme? At a major company, like Du Pont?
- How could we convince management to support such a change?
- How could we convince ordinary workers to support such a change?
Some of the Acme people may drop in to help the discussion.
Discussion
Is everyone here now? Walkerma 15:59, 25 April 2008 (EDT)
OK. You're an enlightened 21st Century executive in a company. How do you go about changing the corporate culture? What's the best strategy to make the environment a real priority, instead of just something you tack on for PR for marketing? Walkerma 16:05, 25 April 2008 (EDT)
hello there! 74.71.203.43 16:04, 25 April 2008 (EDT)
