Difference between revisions of "User:Ccm/sandbox"
< User:Ccm
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
There seems to be no definite answer to this seemingly simple question, as seen very obviously in the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_number wikipedia page on Natural Numbers]. | There seems to be no definite answer to this seemingly simple question, as seen very obviously in the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_number wikipedia page on Natural Numbers]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | The definition of number seen in [http://www.britannica.com/search?query=number&ct=&searchSubmit.x=0&searchSubmit.y=0 Encyclopedia Britannica Online], completely ignores the Natural Numbers and discusses the positive and negative integers, real or comples numbers. | ||
| + | |||
| + | This defintion is a bit odd since it discusses positive and negative integers, but ignores 0. It also bypasses the Rational Numbers to discuss the Real Numbers and Complex Numbers. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
[[Category:Tutorial pages]] | [[Category:Tutorial pages]] | ||
Revision as of 18:46, 29 May 2007
Is 0 a Natural Number?
There seems to be no definite answer to this seemingly simple question, as seen very obviously in the wikipedia page on Natural Numbers.
The definition of number seen in Encyclopedia Britannica Online, completely ignores the Natural Numbers and discusses the positive and negative integers, real or comples numbers.
This defintion is a bit odd since it discusses positive and negative integers, but ignores 0. It also bypasses the Rational Numbers to discuss the Real Numbers and Complex Numbers.
