Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chem395:March 14 discussion"

From WikiChem
Jump to: navigation, search
(followup)
(Discussion)
Line 23: Line 23:
 
http://albuquerque.bizjournals.com/albuquerque/stories/2006/06/19/story7.html
 
http://albuquerque.bizjournals.com/albuquerque/stories/2006/06/19/story7.html
 
[[User:J-Fed|J-Fed]] 16:06, 14 March 2008 (EDT)
 
[[User:J-Fed|J-Fed]] 16:06, 14 March 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::: I agree I feel that they will be off the market anytime soon and they may be our best form of free energy, this still doesn't change the fact that they have huge negative effects on the environment and that if they are going to continue to be used their use needs to be monitored and made sure it is as clean as possible. This epically applies to nations like china that overt he next 50 years are going to be the greatest energy consumers in the world and most of this being produced from coal. [[User:Murphy44|Murphy44]] 16:11, 14 March 2008 (EDT)
  
 
: It's just an example of how changes need to be integrated on all levels in the community. [[User:J-Fed|J-Fed]] 16:07, 14 March 2008 (EDT)
 
: It's just an example of how changes need to be integrated on all levels in the community. [[User:J-Fed|J-Fed]] 16:07, 14 March 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 16:11, 14 March 2008

This will be the eighth in the discussion series. See Chem395:Unit_7 and the discussion topic for background.

Agenda

  • In the coming years, how do you expect usage of fossil fuels to change? Will fossil fuels still dominate our energy production in 2030, as the US government predicts?

Discussion

I'm here. J-Fed 15:55, 14 March 2008 (EDT)
hello, folks! --JGrinst21 15:56, 14 March 2008 (EDT)
Hey! J-Fed 15:57, 14 March 2008 (EDT)
Howdy all Murphy44 15:58, 14 March 2008 (EDT)

Welcome! We will start at 4:00 on my clock. Please can you make sure you read over the comments on the main article page first? Thanks, Walkerma 15:59, 14 March 2008 (EDT)

OK, lets' start. Can we expect fossil fuel consumption to continue its growth, at least over the next 50 years, as Dorf predicts?

I feel that the government is correct in it’s predictions, providing that we don’t run out of oil before that date. This I feel is at the heart of the problem, this is a prediction that is in my opinion setting our goals to low. The technology is here for renewable energy and we need to be moving in that direction. Murphy44 16:02, 14 March 2008 (EDT)
Well I believe it is a reasonable scenario. The numbers may be off somewhat in either direction but it will still negatively affect the environment. On the flip sides since the fossil fuels still exist it would be strange not to use them. However, there needs to be a larger shift to developing new and sustainable energy means/ methods. J-Fed 16:04, 14 March 2008 (EDT)
I expect that the usage of fossil fuels will diminish somewhat over the next few years. They will still exist in the year 2030 and since the research and funding of several projects for alternative fuels is a very time consuming project they may still be the best source of energy. I do not think that fossil fuels are going anywhere soon. An article about such change is shown below through this link: J-Fed 16:06, 14 March 2008 (EDT)

http://albuquerque.bizjournals.com/albuquerque/stories/2006/06/19/story7.html J-Fed 16:06, 14 March 2008 (EDT)

I agree I feel that they will be off the market anytime soon and they may be our best form of free energy, this still doesn't change the fact that they have huge negative effects on the environment and that if they are going to continue to be used their use needs to be monitored and made sure it is as clean as possible. This epically applies to nations like china that overt he next 50 years are going to be the greatest energy consumers in the world and most of this being produced from coal. Murphy44 16:11, 14 March 2008 (EDT)
It's just an example of how changes need to be integrated on all levels in the community. J-Fed 16:07, 14 March 2008 (EDT)

That's a very interesting link, Jesse! I think other places around the world are trying similar initiatives. Are they realistic? Won't people baulk at the higher prices/tax hikes needed to replace the power stations? Walkerma 16:09, 14 March 2008 (EDT)

Footers