Difference between revisions of "Chem321:Discussion 13"

From WikiChem
Jump to: navigation, search
(Hold)
(Update for 2013)
Line 1: Line 1:
You have a lot of work going on, so this discussion is straightforward.  Please leave comments below or on EtherPad, as arrangedIf commenting below, please start your comment with a star, and sign with four tilde marks.
+
You have a lot of work going on, so this discussion is straightforward.  Please leave your initial comment below by Wednesday, August 7th at midnightThen, by Friday at noon, please post a followup answer to two other students' comments.  Please start your comment with a star, and sign with four tilde marks.
 +
 
 +
"Choose one viable green technology that you would like to see widely adopted by 2050.  What would that technology look like, and what effect would it have on our global environmental footprint?
 +
 
 +
==Angela Caracci==
 +
 
 +
 
 +
==Tom Fuchs==
 +
 
 +
 
 +
==Abby Langdon==
 +
 
 +
 
 +
==Katie Lavoie==
 +
 
 +
 
 +
==Magenta Miller==
 +
 
 +
 
 +
==John Rogers==
 +
 
 +
 
 +
==Stefan Sloma==
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 
[[Category:Chemistry 321 discussions]]
 
[[Category:Chemistry 321 discussions]]

Revision as of 02:11, 6 August 2013

You have a lot of work going on, so this discussion is straightforward. Please leave your initial comment below by Wednesday, August 7th at midnight. Then, by Friday at noon, please post a followup answer to two other students' comments. Please start your comment with a star, and sign with four tilde marks.

"Choose one viable green technology that you would like to see widely adopted by 2050. What would that technology look like, and what effect would it have on our global environmental footprint?

Angela Caracci

Tom Fuchs

Abby Langdon

Katie Lavoie

Magenta Miller

John Rogers

Stefan Sloma