Difference between revisions of "User:VegaOne/Sandbox"

From WikiChem
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
'''== Welcome to the Sandbox!!! =='''
+
'''== Open Source: One Way to Achieve Financial Freedom =='''
<br>
 
On this page, we'll discuss the "pros" and "cons" to '''Open Source''' applications.<br>
 
This page is still under development.
 
 
<p>
 
<p>
Instructions:<br>
+
When we hear the words, "open source" we tend to think of applications that may or may not work properly.  Interestingly enough, how is this different from commercially produced applications.  Take the example of Microsoft.  They do put out some applications that are not 100% solid, yet we buy them any way.  This is not an attempt to slam Microsoft.
Please add your comments to either the "pro" or "con" sections.
 
 
</p>
 
</p>
  
 
<p>
 
<p>
PROS:<br>
+
On Microsoft side, they test their products up to a point.  They can only find a certain number of problems and cannot assume every possible senario.  Therefore, if they took that much more time to resolve every possible problem the software has, it [the software] would never see the light of day.
 
</p>
 
</p>
Alternatives to commercial products are free to download.<br>
+
 
[[User:VegaOne|VegaOne]] 19:31, 29 May 2007 (EDT)
 
 
<p>
 
<p>
CONS:<br>
+
But think about how much money you as a customer spend on the software.  Now how about looking at an alternative solution?
 
</p>
 
</p>
Not avalable for every commercial product on the market.<br>
+
 
[[User:VegaOne|VegaOne]] 19:31, 29 May 2007 (EDT)
+
<p>
 +
Let's look at [http://www.openoffice.org/ Open Office].  This suite can handle everything Microsoft's Office Suite can - and thensome.
 +
</p>
 +
 
 +
[[User:VegaOne|VegaOne]] 19:56, 29 May 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 18:56, 29 May 2007

== Open Source: One Way to Achieve Financial Freedom ==

When we hear the words, "open source" we tend to think of applications that may or may not work properly. Interestingly enough, how is this different from commercially produced applications. Take the example of Microsoft. They do put out some applications that are not 100% solid, yet we buy them any way. This is not an attempt to slam Microsoft.

On Microsoft side, they test their products up to a point. They can only find a certain number of problems and cannot assume every possible senario. Therefore, if they took that much more time to resolve every possible problem the software has, it [the software] would never see the light of day.

But think about how much money you as a customer spend on the software. Now how about looking at an alternative solution?

Let's look at Open Office. This suite can handle everything Microsoft's Office Suite can - and thensome.

VegaOne 19:56, 29 May 2007 (EDT)