Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chem395:March 7 discussion"
(→Discussion) |
(Start) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:: I'm here [[User:J-Fed|J-Fed]] 15:58, 7 March 2008 (EST) | :: I'm here [[User:J-Fed|J-Fed]] 15:58, 7 March 2008 (EST) | ||
::: Me To!! [[User:Murphy44|Murphy44]] 16:00, 7 March 2008 (EST) | ::: Me To!! [[User:Murphy44|Murphy44]] 16:00, 7 March 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | OK, let's start. How should we deal with environmental problems from the past. For example, in my home town a few years ago (the one with collapsing mine shafts), they found an area of land with very cadmium contamination left over from a Victorian plant. How should that be dealt with? [[User:Walkerma|Walkerma]] 16:02, 7 March 2008 (EST) | ||
==Footers== | ==Footers== | ||
[[Category:Chemistry 395]] | [[Category:Chemistry 395]] | ||
Revision as of 16:02, 7 March 2008
This will be the seventh in the discussion series. See Chem395:Unit_6 and the discussion topic for background.
Agenda
- We will start by considering historic sites such as Love Canal.
- Then we will consider new problems of pollution and waste - the limitations of "polluter pays" and the tragedy of the commons.
Discussion
OK, let's start. How should we deal with environmental problems from the past. For example, in my home town a few years ago (the one with collapsing mine shafts), they found an area of land with very cadmium contamination left over from a Victorian plant. How should that be dealt with? Walkerma 16:02, 7 March 2008 (EST)
