Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chem395:April 4 discussion"
(→Discussion) |
(start) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==Discussion== | ==Discussion== | ||
| + | OK, I hope that you've all been able to read over the [http://webproxy.potsdam.edu:2075/science?_ob=ArticleListURL&_method=list&_ArticleListID=714734283&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000038980&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=696901&md5=403d93e169d63bfe07d740972e2d7e1c Andy Whitmore's paper], Journal of Cleaner Production 14 (2006) 309-314. (If it fails to load, type the author name and journal name into the search boxes). I'd like you to critique the "Mining, Minerals and Sustainable Development" (MMSD) project. What is good about it? What is bad? [[User:Walkerma|Walkerma]] 16:03, 4 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
==Footers== | ==Footers== | ||
[[Category:Chemistry 395]] | [[Category:Chemistry 395]] | ||
Revision as of 16:03, 4 April 2008
This will be the tenth in the discussion series. See Chem395:Unit_9 and the discussion topic for background.
Agenda
- What are the good and bad points about the "Mining, Minerals and Sustainable Development" (MMSD) project?
- What are the good and bad points about the "London Declaration?"
- Try to resolve these viewpoints and suggest how the mining industry can become more sustainable.
Discussion
OK, I hope that you've all been able to read over the Andy Whitmore's paper, Journal of Cleaner Production 14 (2006) 309-314. (If it fails to load, type the author name and journal name into the search boxes). I'd like you to critique the "Mining, Minerals and Sustainable Development" (MMSD) project. What is good about it? What is bad? Walkerma 16:03, 4 April 2008 (EDT)
