Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chem395:May 2 discussion"
(→Discussion) |
(→Discussion) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==Discussion== | ==Discussion== | ||
Hello! [[User:J-Fed|J-Fed]] 17:59, 7 May 2008 (UTC) | Hello! [[User:J-Fed|J-Fed]] 17:59, 7 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | Hi![[User:Murphy44|Murphy44]] 17:59, 7 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
==Footers== | ==Footers== | ||
[[Category:Chemistry 395]] | [[Category:Chemistry 395]] | ||
Revision as of 13:59, 7 May 2008
The final discussion will be used to try and bring a conclusion to the whole course. The topic will be derived from a slide in Unit 14:
- Society will still need goods to be manufactured.
- Is sustainable manufacturing feasible?
- Full cost accounting – will it become the norm?
- Life Cycle Analysis and ISO 14000: Window dressing or a sea change?
- Remanufacturing, green chemistry – are these realistic & viable, or just environmental dreaming?
- The discussion
You are Minister for Industry for the new US Administration elected in 2008. Pick one specific environmental initiative that you think have the most useful impact (you don't need to be limited to the examples listed above). Make the case for that particular initiative, and explain how it could be paid for.
Discussion
Hello! J-Fed 17:59, 7 May 2008 (UTC) Hi!Murphy44 17:59, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
