Difference between revisions of "Mineral classification"
Physchim62 (talk | contribs) |
Physchim62 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | There are several schemes of '''mineral classification''' in common use, usually derived from published guides to mineralogy. The [[International Mineralogical Association]] (IMA), which governs [[mineral nomenclature]] through its Commission on New Minerals, Nomenclature and Classification (CNMNC), has also proposed the outlines of a unified scheme but, as of December 2009, the details have yet to be finalised: it seems likely that it will be a modified version of the [[Strunz classification]].<ref>{{citation | first1 = Stuart J. | last1 = Mills | first2 = Frédéric | last2 = Hatert | first3 = Ernest H. | last3 = Nickel | first4 = Giovanni | last4 = Ferraris | year = 2009 | title = The standardisation of mineral group hierarchies: application to recent nomenclature proposals | url = http://pubsites.uws.edu.au/ima-cnmnc/Mills%20et%20al%202009%20Groups%20EJM%20October.pdf | journal = Eur. J. Mineral. | volume = 21 | pages = 1073–80}}.</ref> | + | There are several schemes of '''mineral classification''' in common use, usually derived from published guides to mineralogy. The [[International Mineralogical Association]] (IMA), which governs [[mineral nomenclature]] through its Commission on New Minerals, Nomenclature and Classification (CNMNC), has also proposed the outlines of a unified scheme but, as of December 2009, the details have yet to be finalised: it seems likely that it will be a modified version of the [[Strunz classification]].<ref name="IMA">{{citation | first1 = Stuart J. | last1 = Mills | first2 = Frédéric | last2 = Hatert | first3 = Ernest H. | last3 = Nickel | first4 = Giovanni | last4 = Ferraris | year = 2009 | title = The standardisation of mineral group hierarchies: application to recent nomenclature proposals | url = http://pubsites.uws.edu.au/ima-cnmnc/Mills%20et%20al%202009%20Groups%20EJM%20October.pdf | journal = Eur. J. Mineral. | volume = 21 | pages = 1073–80}}.</ref> |
The IMA-CNMNC has proposed the following hierarchy for class names. Some of the existing systems use slightly different terminology. | The IMA-CNMNC has proposed the following hierarchy for class names. Some of the existing systems use slightly different terminology. | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
******Mineral subgroup or mineral series. | ******Mineral subgroup or mineral series. | ||
− | A mineral group is defined by the IMA-CNMNC as | + | A mineral group is defined by the IMA-CNMNC as consisting of "two or more minerals with the same or essentially the same structure, and composed of chemically similar elements."<ref name="IMA"/> |
− | |||
==Strunz classification== | ==Strunz classification== |
Revision as of 15:39, 4 December 2009
There are several schemes of mineral classification in common use, usually derived from published guides to mineralogy. The International Mineralogical Association (IMA), which governs mineral nomenclature through its Commission on New Minerals, Nomenclature and Classification (CNMNC), has also proposed the outlines of a unified scheme but, as of December 2009, the details have yet to be finalised: it seems likely that it will be a modified version of the Strunz classification.[1]
The IMA-CNMNC has proposed the following hierarchy for class names. Some of the existing systems use slightly different terminology.
- Mineral class.
- Mineral subclass.
- Mineral family.
- Mineral supergroup.
- Mineral group.
- Mineral subgroup or mineral series.
- Mineral group.
- Mineral supergroup.
- Mineral family.
- Mineral subclass.
A mineral group is defined by the IMA-CNMNC as consisting of "two or more minerals with the same or essentially the same structure, and composed of chemically similar elements."[1]
Contents
Strunz classification
The Strunz classification was developed by German mineralogist K. Hugo Strunz (1910–2006) in his Mineralogische Tabellen (1941), as an update of the original Dana classification.[2] The then-available Dana classification dated from 1895, and took no account of the discoveries that had been made into mineral structure through X-ray crystallography.
The Strunz tables have been regularly updated, and the last published edition is the ninth (2001).[3] The eighth and ninth editions were cowritten with Australian mineralogist Ernest H. Nickel (died 18 July 2009), and the system is sometimes referred to as Nickel–Strunz classification.
A tenth version of the classification has been developed, but not formally published: it differs only slightly from the version in the ninth edition of the Strunz Mineralogical Tables, mostly by separating out borate minerals into a class of their own, separate from carbonates and nitrates. The new version, sometimes referred to as "Strunz 10", is currently used by the IMA and by many mineralogical databases.[4]
Dana classification
The original Dana classification is the earliest systematic classification of minerals, introduced by James Dwight Dana (1813–95) in his System of Mineralogy. This original classification became somewhat dated with the time lapse between new editions of the book: the sixth edition (edited by Dana's son Edward) was published in 1895, while the seventh did not appear until 1944 and the eighth (as Dana's New Minerology) in 1997.[5][6]
The classification in Dana's New Minerology is slightly different from that which went before it, as it has no fewer that 78 "classes", most of which would be subclasses in other classification systems. Nevertheless, it preserves the concept based on anion composition and structural elements, and all of the new Dana "classes" can be seen as subclasses of the old ones.[7]
Below the "classes" are mineral "types" and mineral "groups", each indicated by a two-digit numbers separated by full points. Finally, within each group, each mineral species is assigned a fourth two-digit number: hence (unlike other classification systems), each mineral is individually numerically identified.[6] Dana classification numbers do, however change from time to time due to reclassification.
Hey's Chemical Index of Minerals
A third classification system was introduced by British mineralogist Max H. Hey (1904–84), and is currently on its third edition.[8][9] Hey's system is more centered on the chemical properties of minerals that on structural features.
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Mills, Stuart J.; Hatert, Frédéric; Nickel, Ernest H.; Ferraris, Giovanni The standardisation of mineral group hierarchies: application to recent nomenclature proposals. Eur. J. Mineral. 2009, 21, 1073–80, <http://pubsites.uws.edu.au/ima-cnmnc/Mills%20et%20al%202009%20Groups%20EJM%20October.pdf>.
- ↑ Strunz Classification; WebMineral.com, <http://webmineral.com/help/StrunzClass.shtml>. (accessed 4 December 2009).
- ↑ Strunz, Hugo; Nickel, Ernest H. Strunz Mineralogical Tables, 9th ed.; Schweizerbart'sche Vbh.: Stuttgart, 2001. ISBN 351065188X.
- ↑ The official IMA-CNMNC List of Mineral Names; International Mineralogical Association, March 2009, <http://pubsites.uws.edu.au/ima-cnmnc/IMA2009-01%20UPDATE%20160309.pdf>. (accessed 4 December 2009).
- ↑ Gaines, Richard V.; Skinner, H. Catherine; Foord, Eugene E.; Mason, Brian; Rosenzweig, Abraham; King, Vandall T. Dana's New Mineralogy; Wiley: New York, 1997. ISBN 047119310-0.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Dana Classification Number; WebMineral.com, <http://webmineral.com/help/DanaClass.shtml>. (accessed 4 December 2009).
- ↑ Minerals Arranged by the New Dana Classification; WebMineral.com, <http://webmineral.com/danaclass.shtml>. (accessed 4 December 2009).
- ↑ Clark, Andrew Hey's Mineral Index, 3rd ed.; Chapman & Hall: London, 1993. ISBN 0412399504.
- ↑ Hey's Chemical Index of Minerals; MinDat.org, <http://www.mindat.org/cim.php>. (accessed 4 December 2009).
Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination |
This page is currently licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license and any later versions of that license. |