Talk:Chem395:April 11 discussion

From WikiChem
Revision as of 16:07, 11 April 2008 by J-Fed (talk | contribs) (ISO 14000)
Jump to: navigation, search

Be sure to look over the ISO 14001 presentation or Design for the Environment before you "listen to" the presentation. You should have a second browser window open at the relevant one of these pages while the person is presenting.

What we will be doing

Each person will explain the pros and cons of introducing their scheme at Acme. You must present a convincing case for the company to spend money. Be warned - some of your audience may be skeptical!

How this will be done

I haven't yet got the technology worked out for doing real time audio, so the presentation will have to be done using the standard text format. Spend perhaps 5-10 minutes typing things, then take questions at the end. You can refer to items on your page, as we will have the page open. We shall try to mainly handle questions at the end.

Presentations

  • Jesse, on ISO 14000
  • Chris, on DfE

ISO 14000

Good afternoon! J-Fed 16:01, 11 April 2008 (EDT)

OK, Jesse, can you start us off? Why should we at Acme spend over $100k/year on getting this? Walkerma 16:02, 11 April 2008 (EDT)

There are many advantages for ACME if we choose to become ISO 14000 certified, which I've outlined in my report. They can can give ACME an edge in competing with non –certified ISO 14000 companies. The certification will reduce time-consuming audits and inspections and we can have a positive affect on the environment. Also, we can lower certain internal costs and increase productivity, reduce pollution and wastes, have less fines and taxes (as well as low insurance rates), ACME will be favored by banks for lending practices, we can be part of the larger international market and our consumers will have more respect for our company because they will have confidence in our environmental stance. J-Fed 16:07, 11 April 2008 (EDT)