Difference between revisions of "Chem321:Discussion 9"
(Update for 2013) |
m (fmt) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Chem321 navigation}} | {{Chem321 navigation}} | ||
| − | This discussion will be held on EtherPad. | + | This discussion will be held on EtherPad. |
| + | |||
| + | ==Future energy: Solar/wind or fossil fuels== | ||
| + | Solar & wind are now [http://www.forbes.com/sites/chipregister1/2014/09/11/solar-continues-trumping-fossil-fuel-pricing-with-more-innovations-to-come/ becoming cheap enough to compete with fossil fuels], and now 30% of electricity in the EU comes from renewables (of which solar/wind comprise 11% - rising rapidly). By 2050, the EU expects to have [http://www.eurel.org/home/TaskForces/Documents/EUREL-PV2040-Short_Version_Web.pdf much of its power from renewables (see p33)]. In contrast, the US Energy Information Administration predicts that fossil fuels will still dominate US power production in 2040, with renewables predicted to [http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/section_elecgeneration.cfm only contribute 17% of the total by 2040]. Are the Europeans just optimistic and the US realistic, or are the US forecasters stuck in the fossil fuel past? What about trying to reduce CO2 emissions? | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Use of biomass as a resource== | ||
| + | Is the biorefinery idea mentioned in Hill a viable one? Consider the pros and cons of biological material resources. | ||
;Locations: | ;Locations: | ||
| − | + | *Group A: 6:30pm-7:30pm Wednesday, July 22, 2015 '''[https://etherpad.net/p/oCXNyXCUGy here]''' | |
| − | + | *Group B: 11am-noon Friday, July 24, 2015 '''[https://etherpad.net/p/6KhqJjxNC9 here]''' | |
[[Category:Chemistry 321 discussions]] | [[Category:Chemistry 321 discussions]] | ||
Latest revision as of 18:14, 22 July 2015
WORLD (Chemistry 321) |
 |
| MAIN PAGE |
|---|
| Syllabus — Schedule |
| Welcome page Contact Dr. Walker |
| This week |
| Today's tasks — (tomorrow) |
| Course units 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 |
| Moodle site |
|
|
| Course content |
| Assignments Paper - Acme - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 |
| Practice problems |
| Discussions |
|
|
| General wiki help |
| Basic editing Create an account Protocols Tutorial Demo, for practice |
This discussion will be held on EtherPad.
Future energy: Solar/wind or fossil fuels
Solar & wind are now becoming cheap enough to compete with fossil fuels, and now 30% of electricity in the EU comes from renewables (of which solar/wind comprise 11% - rising rapidly). By 2050, the EU expects to have much of its power from renewables (see p33). In contrast, the US Energy Information Administration predicts that fossil fuels will still dominate US power production in 2040, with renewables predicted to only contribute 17% of the total by 2040. Are the Europeans just optimistic and the US realistic, or are the US forecasters stuck in the fossil fuel past? What about trying to reduce CO2 emissions?
Use of biomass as a resource
Is the biorefinery idea mentioned in Hill a viable one? Consider the pros and cons of biological material resources.
- Locations
