Difference between revisions of "Chem321:Discussion 13"
(→Alexander Levitz) |
(→Alexander Levitz) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
*In the absence of any catastrophic events that could cripple development (e.g. wars, natural disasters, etc.), our world will look drastically different by 2065, especially if we embrace sustainable development. Firstly, our population will seemingly continue to grow at an excessive rate, which will certainly influence how we progress with the development of our cities. For example, in NYC both the Brooklyn and Manhattan skylines have changed significantly within the past ten years (I have witnessed this from my roof), in that there have been numerous new high-rise constructions (and the new trend, i.e. “pencil skyscrapers”). The growing trend is to increase the population density, thereby necessitating the replacement of various smaller buildings. Thus, by 2065 there will certainly be vastly more high-rise buildings, and a much higher population density in cities. The actual buildings will be incredibly efficient, and will most likely be able to generate most if not all of their energy requirements. This will likely be attained through photovoltaic devices, such as the conventional solar panels on rooftops, but also with transparent photovoltaic “windows” (which maximizes the solar energy production capacity of buildings). There will also hopefully be other various renewable energy sources incorporated into these futuristic buildings, such as more efficient and appropriate wind energy devices (e.g. like the wind tower in Masdar city). Transportation within cities will also improve, with a greater emphasis on public transportation, and radically different personal commuter devices (e.g. the SoloWheel, which is an intriguing self-balancing unicycle Segway commuter). In terms of our usage of matter, it will hopefully no longer be a linear flow, and it will be cyclic with recycling being the last resort. Products will hopefully have longer lifespans, and companies and consumers will change their behaviors (eliminating overconsumption, and the concept of built in obsolescence). Thus, cities will experience immense changes that will completely revamp the cityscapes that we have become accustomed to. | *In the absence of any catastrophic events that could cripple development (e.g. wars, natural disasters, etc.), our world will look drastically different by 2065, especially if we embrace sustainable development. Firstly, our population will seemingly continue to grow at an excessive rate, which will certainly influence how we progress with the development of our cities. For example, in NYC both the Brooklyn and Manhattan skylines have changed significantly within the past ten years (I have witnessed this from my roof), in that there have been numerous new high-rise constructions (and the new trend, i.e. “pencil skyscrapers”). The growing trend is to increase the population density, thereby necessitating the replacement of various smaller buildings. Thus, by 2065 there will certainly be vastly more high-rise buildings, and a much higher population density in cities. The actual buildings will be incredibly efficient, and will most likely be able to generate most if not all of their energy requirements. This will likely be attained through photovoltaic devices, such as the conventional solar panels on rooftops, but also with transparent photovoltaic “windows” (which maximizes the solar energy production capacity of buildings). There will also hopefully be other various renewable energy sources incorporated into these futuristic buildings, such as more efficient and appropriate wind energy devices (e.g. like the wind tower in Masdar city). Transportation within cities will also improve, with a greater emphasis on public transportation, and radically different personal commuter devices (e.g. the SoloWheel, which is an intriguing self-balancing unicycle Segway commuter). In terms of our usage of matter, it will hopefully no longer be a linear flow, and it will be cyclic with recycling being the last resort. Products will hopefully have longer lifespans, and companies and consumers will change their behaviors (eliminating overconsumption, and the concept of built in obsolescence). Thus, cities will experience immense changes that will completely revamp the cityscapes that we have become accustomed to. | ||
| − | Small towns will certainly experience considerable growth, however, I feel that a self-sustaining Mars colony will not really be feasible by 2065. I think that interplanetary (as well as asteroid) mining and resource acquisition ventures will be a reality, but I am | + | Small towns will certainly experience considerable growth, however, I feel that a self-sustaining Mars colony will not really be feasible by 2065. I think that interplanetary (as well as asteroid) mining and resource acquisition ventures will be a reality, but I am skeptical that an actual “space-city” will be a possibility by 2065 (maybe some sort of space station that is the size of a town, like The Ark in the show The 100). Small towns will change significantly in a number of ways. For example, they will likely all be powered by sustainable microgrids, and most of the houses that surround these towns will likely be off the grid. The surrounding areas of these towns will be more pertinent in the future, as these are the agricultural production areas, which will have to successfully and sustainably produce food for significantly more people (which will of course depend on the ability to greatly increase the yields per given area of land, most likely through genetic modifications). Therefore, both cities and towns will change considerably, however, I think more time is required before we will have “space-cities” and hover cars (like in the show Futurama). [[User:Alexanderlevitz|Alexanderlevitz]] ([[User talk:Alexanderlevitz|talk]]) 20:35, 5 August 2015 (EDT) |
==Triston Riley== | ==Triston Riley== | ||
Revision as of 19:38, 5 August 2015
WORLD (Chemistry 321) |
 |
| MAIN PAGE |
|---|
| Syllabus — Schedule |
| Welcome page Contact Dr. Walker |
| This week |
| Today's tasks — (tomorrow) |
| Course units 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 |
| Moodle site |
|
|
| Course content |
| Assignments Paper - Acme - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 |
| Practice problems |
| Discussions |
|
|
| General wiki help |
| Basic editing Create an account Protocols Tutorial Demo, for practice |
You have a lot of work going on, so this discussion is straightforward. Please leave your initial comment below by Wednesday, August 7th at midnight. Then, by Friday at noon, please post a followup answer to one other student's comments. Please start your comment with a star, and sign with four tilde marks.
Dream a little! Imagine a world in the year 2065 where society has successfully made a switch to sustainable living. What would a sustainable city look like? How about a sustainable small town? A self-sustaining Mars colony? Describe some details/specific features you would expect to see. You can assume that technology has made major developments that can be extrapolated from today, but we will not consider major disruptive changes such as the Singularity which are hard to predict & assess. I recommend completing Unit 14 before posting.
Post an answer by 11:59pm on Wednesday, August 5th, 2015. Then post one followup comment on another student's answer by noon on Friday, August 7th, 2015.
Contents
Katie Fetcie
Grant Gallagher
Alexander Levitz
- In the absence of any catastrophic events that could cripple development (e.g. wars, natural disasters, etc.), our world will look drastically different by 2065, especially if we embrace sustainable development. Firstly, our population will seemingly continue to grow at an excessive rate, which will certainly influence how we progress with the development of our cities. For example, in NYC both the Brooklyn and Manhattan skylines have changed significantly within the past ten years (I have witnessed this from my roof), in that there have been numerous new high-rise constructions (and the new trend, i.e. “pencil skyscrapers”). The growing trend is to increase the population density, thereby necessitating the replacement of various smaller buildings. Thus, by 2065 there will certainly be vastly more high-rise buildings, and a much higher population density in cities. The actual buildings will be incredibly efficient, and will most likely be able to generate most if not all of their energy requirements. This will likely be attained through photovoltaic devices, such as the conventional solar panels on rooftops, but also with transparent photovoltaic “windows” (which maximizes the solar energy production capacity of buildings). There will also hopefully be other various renewable energy sources incorporated into these futuristic buildings, such as more efficient and appropriate wind energy devices (e.g. like the wind tower in Masdar city). Transportation within cities will also improve, with a greater emphasis on public transportation, and radically different personal commuter devices (e.g. the SoloWheel, which is an intriguing self-balancing unicycle Segway commuter). In terms of our usage of matter, it will hopefully no longer be a linear flow, and it will be cyclic with recycling being the last resort. Products will hopefully have longer lifespans, and companies and consumers will change their behaviors (eliminating overconsumption, and the concept of built in obsolescence). Thus, cities will experience immense changes that will completely revamp the cityscapes that we have become accustomed to.
Small towns will certainly experience considerable growth, however, I feel that a self-sustaining Mars colony will not really be feasible by 2065. I think that interplanetary (as well as asteroid) mining and resource acquisition ventures will be a reality, but I am skeptical that an actual “space-city” will be a possibility by 2065 (maybe some sort of space station that is the size of a town, like The Ark in the show The 100). Small towns will change significantly in a number of ways. For example, they will likely all be powered by sustainable microgrids, and most of the houses that surround these towns will likely be off the grid. The surrounding areas of these towns will be more pertinent in the future, as these are the agricultural production areas, which will have to successfully and sustainably produce food for significantly more people (which will of course depend on the ability to greatly increase the yields per given area of land, most likely through genetic modifications). Therefore, both cities and towns will change considerably, however, I think more time is required before we will have “space-cities” and hover cars (like in the show Futurama). Alexanderlevitz (talk) 20:35, 5 August 2015 (EDT)
Triston Riley
I imagine that in 2065 the world will indeed be a much different place, and a place where everything we do is in a sustainable manner, and any resources we use will be renewable. I also would like to think that by then we will have a colony on mars that is also self sustaining. This would be an amazing thing to be accomplished by people, and a way to really prove how we have mastered being sustainable. I think all cities will be modeled after the new city of Melbourne where everything will be self sufficient sustainable, and green. I think this will be a amazing thing to see, everyone will need to work together to achieve this goal, making the world a better place. Rileytc197 (talk) 12:27, 3 August 2015 (EDT)
- So you would follow the Melbourne example? What specifics do you like about the Melbourne model that you would like to see replicated elsewhere? Martin A. Walker (talk) 13:01, 3 August 2015 (EDT)
I would like to see multiple aspects of the Melbourne model implemented in the new cities of the future. First I would for sure like to see the big public transport network, and lots of things that are walkable of each other. these two things would cut down greatly on the CO2 emissions due to cars. I would also like to see the city wide usage of recycling programs and increased education of how to properly recycle. Finally I would like to see the usage of the water catchment and usage of storm waters in the city to help cut down there using of natural spring and ground water, or fresh water lakes. Rileytc197 (talk) 19:22, 3 August 2015 (EDT)
Alexane Rodrigue
In 50 years, I believe a self sustaining city would be built in a way that makes everything accessible and in walking distance. Homes and buildings will be built with solar panels and wind turbines, and will be insulated to increase home heating efficiency. The city would be designed in way that promotes riding a bicycle as means of commuting to work, I know Montreal makes this effort by having bike lanes, and bikes parked on the side of the road for rent. There would also be transportation in the form of energy efficient railways that are set up all over the country to allow for fast and efficient travel of long distances. As for manufacturers, they would all need to create greener process that produce no waste, or find ways so that waste can be a feedstock for another process. Recycling infrastructure would be in place to allow for this, and products will be made durable and environmentally friendly. Full cost accounting would be mandatory, and this would allow the green industry to flourish. The use of fossil fuels will be decreased, and it will become costly to continue using them. Cars would all be replaced with hydrogen fuel cell cars, and gas stations replaced will charging stations that utilize renewable energy as fuel. Rodrigaf197 (talk) 17:05, 5 August 2015 (EDT)
