Difference between revisions of "Actinium"
Physchim62 (talk | contribs) (→Discovery) |
Physchim62 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
The German chemist [[Friedrich Giesel]] was also studying the composition of pitchblende, and described a new source of radiation in 1902,<ref>{{citation | first = F. | last = Giesel | authorlink = Friedrich Giesel | title = Ueber Radium und radioactive Stoffe | journal = Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. | year = 1902 | volume = 35 | issue 3 | pages = 3608–11 | doi = 10.1002/cber.190203503187}}.</ref> with further details in 1903.<ref>{{citation | first = F. | last = Giesel | authorlink = Friedrich Giesel | title = Ueber den Emanationskörper aus Pechblende und über Radium | journal = Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. | year = 1903 | volume = 36 | issue = 1 | pages = 342–47 | doi = 10.1002/cber.19030360177}}.</ref> Giesel called his new element emanium, from "[[emanation]]".<ref>{{citation | first = F. | last = Giesel | authorlink = Friedrich Giesel | title = Ueber den Emanationskörper (Emanium) | journal = Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. | year = 1904 | volume = 37 | issue = 2 | pages = 1696–99 | doi = 10.1002/cber.19040370280}}.</ref> Crucially for his claim to discovery, at least as viewed with hindsight, Giesel noted that the chemistry of emanium was very similar to that of [[lanthanum]] and [[cerium]]. | The German chemist [[Friedrich Giesel]] was also studying the composition of pitchblende, and described a new source of radiation in 1902,<ref>{{citation | first = F. | last = Giesel | authorlink = Friedrich Giesel | title = Ueber Radium und radioactive Stoffe | journal = Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. | year = 1902 | volume = 35 | issue 3 | pages = 3608–11 | doi = 10.1002/cber.190203503187}}.</ref> with further details in 1903.<ref>{{citation | first = F. | last = Giesel | authorlink = Friedrich Giesel | title = Ueber den Emanationskörper aus Pechblende und über Radium | journal = Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. | year = 1903 | volume = 36 | issue = 1 | pages = 342–47 | doi = 10.1002/cber.19030360177}}.</ref> Giesel called his new element emanium, from "[[emanation]]".<ref>{{citation | first = F. | last = Giesel | authorlink = Friedrich Giesel | title = Ueber den Emanationskörper (Emanium) | journal = Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. | year = 1904 | volume = 37 | issue = 2 | pages = 1696–99 | doi = 10.1002/cber.19040370280}}.</ref> Crucially for his claim to discovery, at least as viewed with hindsight, Giesel noted that the chemistry of emanium was very similar to that of [[lanthanum]] and [[cerium]]. | ||
− | Debierne had certainly prepared an actinium-containing concentrate by 1904, when he published the [[half-life]] of the "emanation" ([[radon-219]]) and the "induced radioactivity" ([[lead-211]] deposited on surfaces by decay of the <sup>219</sup>Rn).<ref>{{citation | first = A. | last = Debierne | authorlink = André-Louis Debierne | title = Sur l'émanation de l'actinium | journal = C. R. Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci. | year = 1904 | volume = 138 | pages = 411–14 | url = http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k3092p/f435.image.langEN}}.</ref> In the meantime, Giesel had sent a sample of his emanium concentrate to the laboratory of [[Ernest Rutherford]] in Montreal, where [[Harriet Brooks]] determined the half-lives of the "emanation" and of the "induced radioactivity": Brooks's results from Giesel's sample were the same as those found by Debierne in Paris for actinium.<ref name="Rutherford">{{citation | first = E. | last = Rutherford | authorlink = Ernest Rutherford | title = The Succession of Changes in Radioactive Bodies | journal = Philos. Trans. R. Soc., A | year = 1905 | volume = 204 | pages = 169–219 | url = http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k56009j/f185.image.langEN}}.</ref> Both Rutherford<ref name="Rutherford"/> and Debierne<ref>{{citation | first = A. | last = Debierne | authorlink = André-Louis Debierne | title = Sur l'actinium | journal = C. R. Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci. | year = 1904 | volume = 139 | pages = 538–40 | url = http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k30930/f538.image.langEN}}.</ref> proclaimed that emanium was the same as actinium, and Debierne's name stuck for the new element. | + | Debierne had certainly prepared an actinium-containing concentrate by 1904, when he published the [[half-life]] of the "emanation" ([[radon-219]], ''t''<sub>½</sub> = 3.96(1) s) and the "induced radioactivity" ([[lead-211]], ''t''<sub>½</sub> = 36.1(2) min, deposited on surfaces by decay of the <sup>219</sup>Rn).<ref>{{citation | first = A. | last = Debierne | authorlink = André-Louis Debierne | title = Sur l'émanation de l'actinium | journal = C. R. Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci. | year = 1904 | volume = 138 | pages = 411–14 | url = http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k3092p/f435.image.langEN}}.</ref> In the meantime, Giesel had sent a sample of his emanium concentrate to the laboratory of [[Ernest Rutherford]] in Montreal, where [[Harriet Brooks]] determined the half-lives of the "emanation" and of the "induced radioactivity": Brooks's results from Giesel's sample were the same as those found by Debierne in Paris for actinium.<ref name="Rutherford">{{citation | first = E. | last = Rutherford | authorlink = Ernest Rutherford | title = The Succession of Changes in Radioactive Bodies | journal = Philos. Trans. R. Soc., A | year = 1905 | volume = 204 | pages = 169–219 | url = http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k56009j/f185.image.langEN}}.</ref> Both Rutherford<ref name="Rutherford"/> and Debierne<ref>{{citation | first = A. | last = Debierne | authorlink = André-Louis Debierne | title = Sur l'actinium | journal = C. R. Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci. | year = 1904 | volume = 139 | pages = 538–40 | url = http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k30930/f538.image.langEN}}.</ref> proclaimed that emanium was the same as actinium, and Debierne's name stuck for the new element. |
==Notes and references== | ==Notes and references== |
Revision as of 18:49, 4 April 2011
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Actinium (symbol: Ac) is a chemical element, one of the transition metals and also an actinoid. All isotopes of actinium are unstable, with half-lives of less than 22 years:[8] however, actinium-227 (t½ = 21.772(3) a) is formed as a decay product of uranium-235 (t½ = 704(1) × 106 a) and so small amounts of actinium are present in all samples of natural uranium.
Discovery
The story of the discovery of actinium has generated a certain amount of controversy.[1][9][10] Credit is usually given to French chemist André-Louis Debierne, who described a new source of radiation from pitchblende in 1899,[11] with further details in 1900.[12] He named the new element actinium,[12] from the Greek ἀκτίς, aktis (genitive: ἀκτίνος, aktinos) meaning "ray". However, Debierne's descriptions of his concentrates are not entirely consistent with what is now known about is now known about the chemistry of actinium;[9][10] nor, it should be said, were they entirely consistent among themselves.
The German chemist Friedrich Giesel was also studying the composition of pitchblende, and described a new source of radiation in 1902,[13] with further details in 1903.[14] Giesel called his new element emanium, from "emanation".[15] Crucially for his claim to discovery, at least as viewed with hindsight, Giesel noted that the chemistry of emanium was very similar to that of lanthanum and cerium.
Debierne had certainly prepared an actinium-containing concentrate by 1904, when he published the half-life of the "emanation" (radon-219, t½ = 3.96(1) s) and the "induced radioactivity" (lead-211, t½ = 36.1(2) min, deposited on surfaces by decay of the 219Rn).[16] In the meantime, Giesel had sent a sample of his emanium concentrate to the laboratory of Ernest Rutherford in Montreal, where Harriet Brooks determined the half-lives of the "emanation" and of the "induced radioactivity": Brooks's results from Giesel's sample were the same as those found by Debierne in Paris for actinium.[17] Both Rutherford[17] and Debierne[18] proclaimed that emanium was the same as actinium, and Debierne's name stuck for the new element.
Notes and references
Notes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Many of the properties of actinium are only known through estimation and/or extrapolation. Several estimates of the melting point and thermodynamic properties have been made; the boiling point was estimated on the basis of vapour pressure measurements; the electronegativity was estimated on the basis of periodic trends. The density and ionic radii were determined by X-ray crystallography.
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Kirby, H. W.; Morss, L. R. Actinium. In The Chemistry of the Actinide and Transactinide Elements, 3rd ed.; Morss, Lester R.; Edelstein, Norman M.; Fuger, Jean, Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 2006; Vol. 1, Chapter 2, pp 18–51. doi:10.1007/1-4020-3598-5_2, <http://radchem.nevada.edu/classes/rdch710/files/actinium.pdf>.
- ↑ Pauling, Linus The Nature of the Chemical Bond, 3rd ed.; Ithaca, NY, 1960. ISBN 0-8014-0333-2.
- ↑ Sugar, Jack Ionization energies of the neutral actinides. J. Chem. Phys. 1973, 59, 788–91. DOI: 10.1063/1.1680091. Sugar, Jack Revised ionization energies of the neutral actinides. J. Chem. Phys. 1974, 60, 4103. DOI: 10.1063/1.1680874.
- ↑ Moore, Charlotte E. Ionization potentials and ionization limits derived from the analyses of optical spectra. Natl. Stand. Ref. Data Ser., (U.S. Natl. Bur. Stand.) 1970, 34, 1–22, <http://www.nist.gov/data/nsrds/NSRDS-NBS34.pdf>.
- ↑ Cordero, Beatriz; Gómez, Verónica; Platero-Prats, Ana E.; Revés, Marc; Echeverría, Jorge; Cremades, Eduard; Barragán, Flavia; Alvarez, Santiago Covalent radii revisited. Dalton Trans. 2008 (5), 2832–38. DOI: 10.1039/b801115j.
- ↑ Shannon, R. D. Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halids and chalcogenides. Acta Crystallogr. A 1976, 32 (5), 751–67. DOI: 10.1107/S0567739476001551.
- ↑ Greenwood, Norman N.; Earnshaw, A. Chemistry of the Elements; Pergamon: Oxford, 1984; pp 1102–10. ISBN 0-08-022057-6.
- ↑ Audi, G.; Bersillon, O.; Blachot, J.; Wapstra, A. H. The NUBASE evaluation of nuclear and decay properties. Nucl. Phys. A 2003, 729, 3–128. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2003.11.001, <http://amdc.in2p3.fr/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf>.
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 Kirby, H. W. The Discovery of Actinium. Isis 1971, 62 (3), 290–308. DOI: 10.1086/350760.
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 Adloff, J. P. The centenary of a controversial discovery: actinium. Radiochim. Acta 2000, 88, 123–28. DOI: 10.1524/ract.2000.88.3-4.123.
- ↑ Debierne, A. Sur un nouvelle matière radio-active. C. R. Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci. 1899, 129, 593–95, <http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k3085b/f593.image.langEN>.
- ↑ 12.0 12.1 Debierne, A. Sur un nouvelle matière radio-actif – l'actinium. C. R. Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci. 1900, 130, 906–8, <http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k3086n/f906.image.langEN>.
- ↑ Giesel, F. Ueber Radium und radioactive Stoffe. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1902, 35, 3608–11. DOI: 10.1002/cber.190203503187.
- ↑ Giesel, F. Ueber den Emanationskörper aus Pechblende und über Radium. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1903, 36 (1), 342–47. DOI: 10.1002/cber.19030360177.
- ↑ Giesel, F. Ueber den Emanationskörper (Emanium). Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1904, 37 (2), 1696–99. DOI: 10.1002/cber.19040370280.
- ↑ Debierne, A. Sur l'émanation de l'actinium. C. R. Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci. 1904, 138, 411–14, <http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k3092p/f435.image.langEN>.
- ↑ 17.0 17.1 Rutherford, E. The Succession of Changes in Radioactive Bodies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc., A 1905, 204, 169–219, <http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k56009j/f185.image.langEN>.
- ↑ Debierne, A. Sur l'actinium. C. R. Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci. 1904, 139, 538–40, <http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k30930/f538.image.langEN>.
External links
See also the corresponding article on Wikipedia. |
Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination |
This page is currently licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license and any later versions of that license. |